October 4, 2022
Interaction Underneath the Flow
What is the hyporheic zone?
It’s common to suggest that aquifers are underground bodies of water that do not interact with the Earth’s surface. However, aquifer and surface water interaction does occur in a place called the hyporheic zone. The name “hyporheic”, comes from two Greek words: ‘hypo-’ (υπο) under and ‘rhe-’ (ρε) flow: the flow underneath. This interaction happens when water from the stream enters the riverbed sediment (downwelling), or water from the sediment emerges into the stream, (upwelling), and is usually induced by pressure and velocity differences at the channel bottom. Therefore, we can think of the hyporheic exchange as water flowing through the riverbed, right below the actual stream.
The hyporheic zone has been studied because of how important it is for stream dynamics, but only in the last few decades has it also been recognized as an influence on stream ecology, biogeochemistry, and water temperatures. Its importance can be seen in action when downwelling flows bring dissolved solutes into the riverbed and modify its concentrations by mixing surface water with the water in the sediments.
Importance of hyporheic zone
Figure 1. A) Downwelling flux introduces oxygen-rich streamwater into sediment pores, allowing the salmon eggs to consume enough oxygen. B) Downwelling flux introduces water rich in reactive nitrogen forms. Microbes consume these nitrogen forms and transform them into elemental nitrogen, a no-harmful nitrogen form, then elemental nitrogen is incorporated into the water column through upwelling hyporheic fluxes. Graphic by Nicole Hucke.
This process is extremely important because excess reactive nitrogen can make water unfit for human consumption and can affect the overall health of the river. When there is too much nitrogen in the river, aquatic plants and algae are overgrown, which in turn can use up the dissolved oxygen in the water and can completely deplete it for the rest of the aquatic species. This process is called eutrophication, which has severe consequences on the environment such as causing fish kills (due to lack of oxygen). If it weren’t for hyporheic flow, the high concentrations of nitrogen would not reach the sediment pores, and microbes would not be able to consume it.
Call for Action: More research is needed!
Countless other biochemical cycles and interactions occur in our aquatic and terrestrial environments, and when we include the influence of human activities into the picture, things begin to get even more complex. Activities such as agriculture and energy production increase the reactive nitrogen concentrations in many aquatic ecosystems, which can cause the effects that were mentioned earlier. This is one of the main reasons hyporheic flow has been considered a focus for river restoration projects regarding nutrient cycling in the river systems.
The importance of hyporheic exchange in surface water quality and riverine habitat for aquatic and terrestrial organisms has slowly been considered an important component of conserving, managing, and restoring river systems. However, there is still a long way to go when it comes to research, as it is a fairly new topic, and there is still so much we don’t know.
How do we determine the physical extension of the hyporheic zone? How can we quantify the rate and magnitude of water being exchanged between surface water and sediment-water? How does it vary spatially within a river? These are all questions scientists have been trying to answer, but every river is so vastly different that there are still so many things yet to be explored and discovered!
If you want to know more about this topic the author recommends the following resources:
Hill, A. R., & Lymburner, D. J. (1998). Hyporheic zone chemistry and stream-subsurface exchange in two groundwater-fed streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55(2), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1139/f97-250
Master, Y., Shavit, U., & Shaviv, A. (2005). Modified Isotope Pairing Technique to Study N Transformations in Polluted Aquatic Systems: Theory. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(6), 1749–1756. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049086c
Stuart, T. A. (1953). Water Currents through Permeable Gravels and their Significance to Spawning Salmonids, etc. Nature, 172(4374), 407–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/172407a0
Wagenschein, D., & Rode, M. (2008). Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—A case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany). Ecological Modelling, 211(1), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.09.009